- Print
- DarkLight
- PDF
Civil Likelihood of Failure (Steps 5 & 7)
Find below additional details for Step 5 and Step 7 of the Civil RBI Methodology.
If the Consequence is due to the occurrence of an assets design condition, and the design condition remains credible, the Consequence Likelihood should be equal to the probability of the design condition. A table that has been used to help practitioners at Shell deal with the cross-reference is shown below for civil related assets.
Likelihood vs probability of the design condition:
A | B | C | D | E |
---|---|---|---|---|
Never heard of in the industry | Heard of in the industry | Has happened in the organization or more than once in the industry | Has happened at the location or more than once in the organization | Has happened more than once in the location |
< 0.01% | < 0.1% | <1% | <10% | <100% |
Less than once in 10,000 yrs | One in 1,000 to one in 10,000 yrs | One in 100 to one in 1,000 yrs | One in 10 to one in 100 yrs | Annually to once in 10 yrs |
We would be greatly amazed to see it happen | We would think it unusual | We would not be surprised to see it happen |
In the case where a combination exists between age-related and incident related failure the resultant probability will suffice using this table. In this section, we evaluate the likelihood rating and subsequently the risk rating for a combined age-related and event-based failure of an asset. If A = age-related failure and B = event-based failure, we ask the question: “what is the confidence in (or joint probability of) the likelihood rating, given that both A and B can occur?”.
For example, assume a storm with 1 in 100-year probability (event A) and a critical wind resisting Component in a steel structure with a probability of a continued rate of corrosion of 0.1 due to other effects (event B), the resulting probability would be 1 in 1,000.
For the age-related corrosion, we first determine the remnant life, which is assumed to be between 5 -10 years and use the default confidence class as Intermediate. This gives a likelihood rating of C, which translates into a probability p, 0.1%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the expression p(A∩B) = p(A) * p (B) for independent events, we determine that p(A∩B) is < 0.1% which is a likelihood rating of B.
According to the Risk = Likelihood * Consequence relationship, for any scenario, the consequence remains constant while the likelihood is a variable. For the example, we assume that the age-related failure and the event-related failure have a similar medium consequence and thus both have a risk rating of R2. With a likelihood rating of B, the risk rating of both A and B occurring together is now R1.
Let C = event that the asset will fail after it reaches a critical point in a particular year. We now pose the question: “What is the probability (or likelihood rating in this context) that the asset will reach the projected critical point in that particular year given that it has experienced a combined Age-Related and event-based failure?
Consider the conditional probability:For the purpose of the example, we assume that joint probability of A, B and C has a likelihood rating of A. We may try to solve p (C∩A∩B) intuitively by equating it to p(A) * p(B) * p(C). This is not correct as while A and B are mutually independent, A, B and C are not.
The probability of C given that A and B has occurred will be <10% which will be a likelihood rating of D and a risk rating of R2, meaning that we would not be surprised to see it happen. An example of this is a storage tank with structural deformities such as corrosion causing a decrease in wall thickness. Such a deformation can reduce the critical wind load that can cause failure to the tank.