• Beta
Civil Profile of Failure Risk (Step 7)
  • 09 Aug 2024
  • 1 Minute to read
  • Contributors
  • Dark
    Light
  • PDF

Civil Profile of Failure Risk (Step 7)

  • Dark
    Light
  • PDF

Article summary

Find below additional details for Step 7 of the Civil RBI Methodology.

The time-dependency of likelihood can be used to define a profile of the future risks. This is obviously only applicable for age-related failures. The likelihood class can be determined from the likelihood matrix as shown below. In this method, it is assumed that the degradation rate is constant.The likelihood class can be determined from the likelihood matrix.

Example:     
  • The study is conducted in 2007
  • The last inspection was conducted in 2004
  • During the inspection it was found that asset is in a good condition and the remnant life was estimated at 15 years, i.e. failure is expected around 2019
  • Governing failure consequences are H
  • The confidence in this estimation is Intermediate

Result:

Year

RL+LID-Now

Likelihood class

Risk class

2007

15+2004-2007 = 12

B

R2

2010

15+2004-2010 = 9

C

R2

2015

15+2004-2015 = 4

D

R3

The key question here is: “What is the failure risk at the present time?”

Note that in this context the present time means “the failure risk as evaluated at this time using the data from the most recent inspection”.

Failure risk is a combination of consequence of failure and likelihood of failure. As indicated earlier the RAM is used to determine the present risk, see below.

Risk Assessment Matrix.

The risk matrix distinguishes four risk levels. R1 denotes Low, R2 denotes Medium and R3 denotes High and R4 Very High. Site management should decide for each level whether the risk is as low as practicable (ALARP). Depending on the failure consequence, it may be decided to have a managed run-to-failure approach for certain assets or have a PM plan with upkeep tasks. Note that strictly speaking ALARP is on an asset by asset basis – especially in the R3 and R4 areas and for this reason practitioners are invited to do the economic PM task first to see if it is worth the funds.

When an operating unit uses a different risk assessment matrix, then it may be possible to map the outcome of the Shell RAM in IMS with the site-specific RAM.


Was this helpful? Click to add feedback comments

Changing your password will log you out immediately. Use the new password to log back in.
First name must have atleast 2 characters. Numbers and special characters are not allowed.
Last name must have atleast 1 characters. Numbers and special characters are not allowed.
Enter a valid email
Enter a valid password
Your profile has been successfully updated.
ESC

Eddy AI, facilitating knowledge discovery through conversational intelligence