• Beta
SIF Analysis Overview
  • 09 Aug 2024
  • 2 Minutes to read
  • Contributors
  • Dark
    Light
  • PDF

SIF Analysis Overview

  • Dark
    Light
  • PDF

Article summary

This online manual explains the SIF Analysis module in IMS SIS:

  • How the SIF Analysis fits into the Safety Life Cycle.
  • How to interpret and use the Analysis Main Screen (grid list).
  • How to create a new SIF Analysis.
  • How to determine the SIF’s Target PFD.
  • How to interpret and use the Analysis Details Page to do a SIF design.

A Safety Instrumented System (SIS) typically monitors the same variables as the Process Control System (BPCS) and acts when a variable is outside its normal range, e.g., when the BPCS fails. Each SIS performs one or more Safety Instrumented Functions (SIF). SIFs comprise out of three elements: Sensors (e.g., a flowmeter), Logic Solvers (e.g., a safety PLC) that detect dangerous conditions, and Final Control Elements (e.g., a valve) that are manipulated to achieve a safe state.

A close up of a sign  Description automatically generatedThe three elements of a SIF.

SIFs respond to specific, defined hazards, by implementing specific actions to put the equipment into a safe state to provide a defined degree of risk reduction. The risk reduction required from a SIF is characterized by the Safety Integrity Level (SIL).

SIL indicates the degree of risk reduction, provided by a SIF, implemented by a SIS, within a given process. It is a measure of the SIF’s performance, in terms of Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD). When designing a SIF, the appropriate SIL is crucial for achieving the required level of safety. 

IEC 61508 defines four SIL levels, with SIL 4 providing the highest level of safety performance. The table below shows the associated PFD upper and lower limits and RRF (Risk Reduction Factors) upper and lower limits for each SIL. It differs depending on the mode (Demand vs Continuous mode – see Assessment Summary).

SIL Table (Demand Mode):

SIL
PFD
RRF

-

PFD ≥ 1

RRF ≤ 1

A

1 > PFD ≥ 0.1

1 < RRF ≤ 10

SIL 1

0.1 > PFD ≥ 0.01

10 < RRF ≤ 100

SIL 2

0.01 > PFD ≥ 0.001

100 < RRF ≤ 1000

SIL 3

0.001 > PFD ≥ 0.0001

1000 < RRF ≤ 10000

SIL 4

0.0001 > PFD ≥ 0.00001

10000 < RRF ≤ 100000

X

0.00001 > PFD ≥ 0.000001

100000 < RRF ≤ 1000000

SIL Table (Continuous mode): 

SIL
Average λ(frequency of dangerous failures) per hour
Average λ(frequency of dangerous failures) per year
-0.001 >λd ≥ 0.0001
λ 0.876 
A0.0001 > λd ≥ 0.00001
0.876 >λd ≥ 0.0876
SIL 10.00001 > λd ≥ 0.000001
0.0876 > λd ≥ 0.00876
SIL 20.000001 > λd ≥ 0.0000001
0.00876 > λd ≥ 0.000876
SIL 30.0000001 > λd ≥ 0.00000001
0.000876 > λd ≥ 0.0000876
SIL 40.00000001 > λd ≥ 0.000000001
0.0000876 > λd ≥ 0.00000876
X0.000000001 > λd ≥ 0.0000000001
0.000000876 > λd

Normally, a higher SIL level means a more complex system and higher installation and maintenance costs. Process plants typically only require SIL 1 and SIL 2 SIFs.

To determine a SIF’s SIL level, the SIF’s overall PFD must be calculated. This SIL calculation combines the Failure Rate data for each of the individual SIF elements and accounts for test frequency, redundancy, voting arrangements, etc.


Was this helpful? Click to add feedback comments

Changing your password will log you out immediately. Use the new password to log back in.
First name must have atleast 2 characters. Numbers and special characters are not allowed.
Last name must have atleast 1 characters. Numbers and special characters are not allowed.
Enter a valid email
Enter a valid password
Your profile has been successfully updated.
ESC

Eddy AI, facilitating knowledge discovery through conversational intelligence