- Print
- DarkLight
- PDF
PL External Corrossion Assessment
Take note
This article explains how to use and interpret the External Corrosion Assessment module in IMS PLSS and its role in calculating the Remaining life of External sections. The module allows you to specify both Past and Future Corrosion Rates, which are essential inputs for the RBA. By utilizing these Corrosion Rates, the RBA assessment can determine the Remaining life of the external sections of pipelines. Additionally, this module provides access to CP data, CIPS data, Rectifier station data, Wet insulation data, and DCVG data. The External Corrosion Assessment module is available only for the following Equipment Groups of Pipe Type Carbon steel and CRA:
Pipeline
Pipeline Jumper
Flowline
To open the External Corrosion module:
Navigate to the Equipment Main Screen.
Find your Equipment.
Click on the Equipment ID.
In the header of the applicable Equipment Details Page, click on the External Corrosion button.
External Corrosion Assessment
The External Corrosion Assessment section is divided into five sub-sections:
ECH
In this grid, an overview of previous assessments will be shown.
Example
In the image below, one Assessment was performed in January 2015.
The Indicator is colored based on the comparison of the Worst Future CR compared to the Design CR which has been calculated in the RBA module. The indicator is colored:
Red: if the Worst Future Corrosion Rate is more than four times the Design Corrosion Rate or if the Past and/or Future Corrosion Rate is missing.
Orange: if the Future Corrosion Rate is between one and four times the Design Corrosion Rate.
Green: if the Worst Future Corrosion Rate is less or equal to the Design Corrosion Rate.
A black circle around the Indicator means the ECH has been Final Approved.
Note: The Condition date is the Assessment date that will be used in the RBA module to calculate the Remaining Life.
Adding External Corrosion Assessment
Click the Plus button.
Enter the required data in the pop-up window.
Click Save when done.
On the ECH Detaiils Page of the ECH you created, the "GENERAL" checklist will already be selected and under Actions performed "EXTERNAL CORROSION ASSESSMENT" option will be set to "Yes". The Checklist section displays the Internal Corrosion Assessment Graph with the Sectioning section and Confidence Rating questionaire.
Note: In case you do not see the sectiones mentioned above, on the ECH Details Page, in the Checklist section, under Actions performed click on the Grid button.
Take note
If you are creating the Internal corrosion Assessment ECH from any other page except the Internal Corrosion Assessment module, Plan Codes will not be selected automatically and you will need to do it manually:
Under Checklist select "GENERAL".
Under Actions performed, next to the "INTERNAL CORROSION ASSESSMENT" select "YES".
Adding Pipeline Sections to the ECH
Next you have to create Pipeline sections and add their Past and Future Corrosion rates and Corrosion Morphology type. If there are previous Assessments, the Pipeline Sectioning will be copied from the last Assessment but the Past CR and Future CR have to be specified.
To add Sections manually:
On the ECH Details Page of the newly created ECH, scroll to the Checklists section.
Click the Plus button under the Graph.
In the Start At field, enter the distance from the very start of the pipeline to where this section begins.
In the Past CR field, enter the past corrosion rate for that section of the Pipeline.
In the Future CR field, enter the future corrosion rate for that section of the Pipeline.
From the Corrosion Morphology drop-down menu, select the applicable option.
Click Save.
Repeat the process to add additional Sections.
Next, you will have to fill in the Confidence Rating questionnaire:
Click Edit.
Tick the checkbox(es) next to the applicable questions.
Enter a Comment if needed.
Click Save.
Lastly, Final Approve the ECH.
More details can be found in the PL External Corrosion Assessment Appendix 1.
External Corrosion Assessment Graph
In the Graph subsection, the External Defects are shown in pink. Different Corrosion Rates are shown as described in the legend. The orange lines denote the different sections of the Pipeline.
The Corrosion Rate and Morphology grid
This subsection contains a grid with data related to different Sections of the Pipeline and their associated Morphologies.
In the table below most of the columns from the grid are explained.
Column title | Description |
Start At | Start of the section, first section always starts at zero. |
Length | The length of the section. |
Model CR | The combined CR from the Excor model. |
Long CR | The maximum corrosion rate from the last IP run (excluding depth sizing accuracies). The time difference used is from theILI date and date in service. |
Short CR | The maximum Corrosion Rate from the last two ILI runs. You should import and analyze data in the ILI comparison module first. |
Monitoring CR | The Monitoring Corrosion Rate (optional). |
Past CR | The Past Corrosion Rate that will be used in the RBA Assessment. This Corrosion Rate is used to calculate the Remaining Corrosion Allowance and the Assessed Corrosion Rate for the Probability of Failure. For more information see PL Risk Based Assessment. |
Future CR | The Future Corrosion Rate that will be used in the RBA Assessment to calculate the Remaining Life and the Assessed Corrosion Rate for the Probability of Failure. For more information see PL Risk Based Assessment. |
Corrosion Morphology | Here the expected Corrosion Morphology should be specified, “Pitting”, “Grooving” or “General Corrosion”. The selection will be used in the RBA assessment to calculate the remaining corrosion allowance in case no defects are present in a section. For more information see PL Risk Based Assessment. |
Pitting | The number of Defects in the category Pitting. The length of the Defect divided by the depth of the defect is less than 20. |
Grooving | The number of Defects in the category Grooving. The length of the Defect divided by the depth of the defect is between 20 and 80. |
General | The number of Defects in the category General. The length of the Defect divided by the depth of the defect is greater than 80. |
Confidence Rating - External
For the Confidence assessment, a questionnaire is provided. Read carefully the statements made. The tick mark provided (or not provided) should be backed with arguments in the Comment option.
The image below, illustrates the Questionaire for Onshore Pipelines:
For Offshore Pipelines, the Questionnaire is the same as for internal corrosion:
The Confidence Rating is calculated based on selected questions. The default Confidence Rating is Medium. There are five questions in total and upon checking the box for each question Confidence Rating changes.
The default/starting level is “Medium”, and the 1st and 5th questions are negative. The other questions are positive. Checking a negative question will lower the level of confidence by one class and checking a positive question will raise the level of confidence by one class. The levels are: Very Low, Low, Medium, High, and Very High.
The Confidence assessment is performed for the entire Pipeline, not per Section. In the Design data, the user specifies whether the Pipeline/Flowline is "Onshore", "Offshore" or both. For Internal Corrosion, the questionnaire is the same. For External Corrosion, different questionnaires are available if the Pipeline is Onshore or Offshore.
The table below provides explanations for the questions in the Confidence Rating Questionnaire for Offshore Pipelines.
Field | Explanation |
---|---|
Degradation is unstable/not understood/not controlled | Mark when: there is uncertainty about the root cause of the degradation or the root cause is known but it has been agreed that it cannot be controlled. |
Reliable corrosion assessment has been carried out | Corrosion, Inspection, and related expertise have been consulted and their judgments have been incorporated in the assessment. |
Relevant process parameters are reliably monitored | The dominant process parameters influencing the degradation rate, as identified by the team of degradation experts, are monitored. |
Reliable and accurate inspection has been carried out | Verification of the predicted degradation has been performed. The type of verification and tools applied are a result of discussions between the degradation experts and inspection engineers. UT mapscan, MFL and/or UT pigging surveys are examples of acceptable inspection methods. |
No inspection has been carried out | Mark when: no verification of the expected degradation rate has been done. For new Pipelines, this query is commonly marked. |
Corrosion Morphology Plot
This chart shows three categories: “Pitting”, “Grooving” and “General”. The categorization is based on the ratio of defect length to depth:
Defects with a ratio less than 20 fall under the category "Pitting."
Defects with a ratio greater than 80 are classified as "General."
Defects falling between these values are categorized as "Grooving."
In this plot, the blue lines, L/d = 20 and L/d = 80, divide the graph into a Pitting, Grooving and General area.
By clicking on a row in the Morphology Grid above, the Defects of the selected Section will be shown in the Corrosion Morphology Plot.
The Remnant Life Plot
The Remnant Life plot illustrates the Wall Thickness trends over time, featuring the Nominal Wall Thickness, estimated values at Assessment dates, Limit State, and the depth of the most severe defect found during Inspection. The accompanying table presents the Assessment dates with their corresponding estimated Wall Thickness values and indicates the projected date when the Wall Thickness will reach zero.
In this graph:
The blue dots represent the Nominal Wall Thickness, and the Estimated Wall Thickness at the Assessment dates.
The red line shows the LimState if there are no Defects in the section, otherwise it shows the Minimum Required Thickness.
The red dots represent the Corrosion Tolerance based on the Defect.
The accompanying table presents the Assessment dates with their corresponding estimated Wall Thickness values and indicates the projected date when the Wall Thickness will reach zero.